MailScanner Digest, Vol 120, Issue 4

[Maarten]

I checked my logs and the dkim headers get added, then mailscanner
processes the mail


On 12/04/2015 01:00 PM, mailscanner-request at lists.mailscanner.info wrote:
> Send MailScanner mailing list submissions to
> 	mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.mailscanner.info/listinfo/mailscanner
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	mailscanner-request at lists.mailscanner.info
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	mailscanner-owner at lists.mailscanner.info
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of MailScanner digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. dkim and Mailscanner (Maarten)
>    2. Re: dkim and Mailscanner (Mark Sapiro)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 22:24:49 +0100
> From: Maarten <mailinglists at feedmebits.nl>
> To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> Subject: dkim and Mailscanner
> Message-ID: <5660B321.8040108 at feedmebits.nl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm having a problem getting dkim to work together with mailscanner. I
> noticed some comments about dkim in the comments so I took the advice of
> the comments.
>
> Multiple Headers = add
>
> # Some people prefer that message headers are added in strict order with
> # the newest headers at the top and the oldest headers at the bottom.
> # This is also required if you receive a message which is authenticated by
> # DKIM, and you are forwarding that message onto somewhere else, and want
> # not to break the DKIM signature.
> # **Note**: To avoid breaking DKIM signatures, you *must* also set
> #   Multiple Headers = add
> # So if some of your users forward mail from PayPal, Ebay or Yahoo! to
> # accounts stored on Gmail or Googlemail, then you need to set this to "yes"
> # and "Multiple Headers = add" to avoid breaking the DKIM signature.
> # It may be worth using a ruleset to just apply this to messages sent by
> # the companies mentioned above.
> # This can also be the filename of a ruleset.
> Place New Headers At Top Of Message = yes
>
> Each time I got the following error:
>
> dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@feedmebits.nl
>
>
> I thought I'd try doing a test by taking out mailscanner, only using postfix, and now I'm getting:
>
> dkim=pass header.i=@feedmebits.nl
>
>
> So for some reason Mailscanner is changing the body hash of the dkim signature. Any know what what's causing this and how to fix it?
> I can't find any other config setting in Mailscanner that would fixes this.
>
>
>
>
> Maarten
>
>
>
>


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.