Mailscanner + postfix: dealing with huge loads on distributed mailserver setup
maxsec at gmail.com
Sun Aug 9 08:46:48 UTC 2015
Another way is to get the marketing crew to use a no-reply type address
thatll just bounce (you're check invalid recipients in pf right) and
something like constant contact to send the campaigns in the first place.
Theyll them way better metrics about opens etc
On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 at 22:46, <l at avc.su> wrote:
> Hi All.
> We've got 2 servers with MailScanner+Mailwatch, using Postfix as MTA.
> Recently we've experienced huge incoming load from distributed locations
> (our marketing team fired up large newsletter and our corporate server
> got about 10K "auto-reply" mails in just 20 minutes), and our 'hold'
> queue got filled up with mails. It caused big delay in recieving
> legitimate mails, and MailScanner (15 children max.) was buisy with them
> for about an hour.
> Is there any way to prevent Postfix from recieving any new mail if there
> is a clog in Hold queue? For example, if there are more than 500
> messages, don't recieve new mail and respond with 421 code so clients
> would go to another mail server?
> I haven't found any solid measures against it, and I'm considering to
> write own policy-server for Postfix. It's complicated task (and I'm lack
> of coding skills), and I want to be sure that I haven't missed vanilla
> setting for this.
> So, basically, there two questions: is there some sort of failswitch to
> prevent Postfix to get new connections if there is a clog in queue, and
> how do you deal with huge mailing loads?
> Thank you.
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the MailScanner