Executable vs Binary
kevin.miller at juneau.org
Wed Apr 22 19:36:32 UTC 2015
Shawn – any progress on this? The message with the files that Jerry attached in his reply to you got blocked by my MailScanner gateway (I just noticed that today). Did you receive them? If not, you’ll have to get them via ftp or something. If you did receive them OK, have you had a chance to work on the issue?
Network/email Administrator, CBJ MIS Dept.
155 South Seward Street
Juneau, Alaska 99801
Phone: (907) 586-0242, Fax: (907) 586-4500
Registered Linux User No: 307357
From: MailScanner [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Shawn Iverson
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 6:56 AM
To: MailScanner Discussion
Subject: Re: Executable vs Binary
I will study this and see if I can assist.
Do you have a sample document with this .dat embedded?
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Jerry Benton <jerry.benton at mailborder.com<mailto:jerry.benton at mailborder.com>> wrote:
Has anyone dealt with this? I can’t decide if I should mod the source or just change the configs:
- Microsoft document comes through with some sort of dat file embedded. While MS see that dat file as text/plain, the character set is binary, so it nails it as an executable.
- Allowing executables will allow the file.
So, there’s the rub. Under the current code we have to allow executables for these “newer” types of Microsoft documents to get through. This isn’t restricted to just Microsoft. There are several other file formats that make MailScanner fire on this.
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info<mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
Director of Technology
Rush County Schools
iversons at rushville.k12.in.us<mailto:iversons at rushville.k12.in.us>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the MailScanner