Antivirus performance, AVG

[Martin Hepworth]

TO concurr with Steve and Valentin,

using clamd (and clamdscan) is way faster that clamscan

the 0.98 track of ClamAv has been troublesome. the 0.98.4 is looking
promising to resolve these issues.

-- 
Martin Hepworth, CISSP
Oxford, UK


On 19 May 2014 09:51, Valentin Laskov <it at festa.bg> wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> which version is ClamAV. There are some bugs in last ClamAV 0.98.3
> There's clamav-0-98-4rc1 [1] as a bug fix release candidate.
> I'm still using ClamAV 0.98.1 and trying to compile 4rc1
>
> [1]
> http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/2014/05/17/clamav-0-98-4rc1-is-now-available/
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Welsh" <paul at welshfamily.com>
> To: "MailScanner discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 1:00 AM
> Subject: Antivirus performance, AVG
>
>
> | Hi folks
> |
> | I ran into some problems recently with the performance of clamscan on my
> | virtual CentOS 6.5 box. Essentially it is slow and resource intensive.
>  It
> | was causing major performance issues on my server.
> |
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20140519/17638102/attachment.html