NDRs marked as spam

[Martin Hepworth]

So what do the logs say about it?
Are you signing the headers outbound or not?

-- 
Martin Hepworth, CISSP
Oxford, UK


On 9 May 2014 20:08, Jerry Benton <jerry.benton at mailborder.com> wrote:

>  No, this happens from internal  servers relaying emails outbound. The MTA
> is not performing any ip related checks, but I will review in case I missed
> something.
>
>
> On 5/9/14, 8:21 PM, Jeremy McSpadden wrote:
>
> IP found on an RBL at MTA time ?
>
>
>
> --
> Jeremy McSpadden
> Flux Labs | http://www.fluxlabs.net | Endless Solutions
> Office : 850-250-5590x501 <850-250-5590;501> | Cell : 850-890-2543 | Fax
> : 850-254-2955
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:06 AM -0700, "Jerry Benton" <
> jerry.benton at mailborder.com> wrote:
>
>  Has anyone seen NDRs getting marked as spam without even being scanned
> by SA? I am seeing the behavior and am assuming it is a MailScanner thing
> since the message never seems to pass through SA.
>
>  I am assuming the null sender is triggering it.
>
>  --
>
> --
>  Jerry Benton
>  Mailborder Systems
> www.mailborder.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20140509/5019af6c/attachment.html