Postfix long queue IDs

[Jerry Benton]

If someone has the correction, please send it to me and I will update the
repository: jerry.benton at mailborder.com

After that I will email Jules about generating a new release package as we
have other items that need to be included in a new build anyway.

Jerry Benton
www.mailborder.com


On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Joolee <mailscanner at joolee.nl> wrote:

>
> https://github.com/MailScanner/MailScanner/blob/master/mailscanner/bin/MailScanner/Postfix.pm
> After line 1500, you'll find a method where the folder depth for postfix
> is detected. This method seems flawed because it only supports a folder
> depth of 1 and otherwise returns 2.
> Around line 1630, there is separate code for when folder depth for postfix
> queues is 0, 1 or 2. This code should be rewritten to support any depth by
> using recursion. I'm afraid I don't have time for that now though.
>
>
> On 5 May 2014 11:19, Alvaro Marín <alvaro at hostalia.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> I see that the problem appears using Postfix's long IDs and
>> hash_queue_depth > 1 (I use this feature with "2").
>> With hash_queue_depth=1 (Postfix's default) and changing the regexp of
>> Postfix.pm, as is said in the thread of the URL I pasted before, runs
>> fine.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> On 30/04/14 12:46, Alvaro Marín wrote:
>> > Yes, I know that it can be disabled, but I would prefer to use it
>> > (sometimes, Postfix IDs are repeated).
>> > Perhaps someone has a patch to can use it, if not, I'll try to do it.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > On 30/04/14 12:05, Jerry Benton wrote:
>> >> Are you running long queue ID's? If so, try disabling that in Postfix
>> >> until we can get the source updated to handle the long format.
>> >>
>> >> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#enable_long_queue_ids
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Alvaro Marín <alvaro at hostalia.com
>> >> <mailto:alvaro at hostalia.com>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>     Hi,
>> >>
>> >>     I've found this thread:
>> >>
>> >>
>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/2013-March/100441.html
>> >>
>> >>     about the long queue IDs in Postfix (>2.9).
>> >>     Is there any solution to this problem (MailScanner doesn't
>> recognize the
>> >>     long Postfix queue IDs)? I've tried that solution but it doesn't
>> work
>> >>     for me.
>> >>
>> >>     Thanks!
>> >>     Regards,
>> >>
>> >>     --
>> >>     Alvaro Marín Illera
>> >>     Hostalia Internet
>> >>     www.hostalia.com <http://www.hostalia.com>
>> >>
>> >>     --
>> >>     MailScanner mailing list
>> >>     mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> >>     <mailto:mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
>> >>     http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>> >>
>> >>     Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>> >>
>> >>     Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jerry Benton
>> >> Mailborder Systems
>> >> www.mailborder.com <http://www.mailborder.com>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alvaro Marín Illera
>> Hostalia Internet
>> www.hostalia.com
>>
>> --
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>
>> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>>
>> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>>
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
>


-- 

--
Jerry Benton
Mailborder Systems
www.mailborder.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20140505/53f141e3/attachment.html