New? behavior og rbl's

Peter Farrow peter at
Fri Sep 23 13:11:58 IST 2011

On 23/09/2011 12:54, Alex Broens wrote:
> On 2011-09-23 13:33, Peter Farrow wrote:
>> Sending out on different IPs is nonsense.
> it's as nonsense as being insured - chances you really need it, is 
> under normal circumstances, rather small.
> The fact that a network probably was infected clearly shows having his 
> mail server on a separate IP *could"  have spared him lots of headaches.
>> and yes I am having a bad day... (but not with spam or blacklists)
> lets all wish you a better day :)
 >>it's as nonsense as being insured

Funnily enough thats what my bad day is all about - insurance 
companies!!! Arrrrrrgggggghhh

But the best solution is probably to shift the IP of the gateway by one, 
if this happens rather than always have a second gateway.

When I provision circuits for small companies I always go for a /29 
network so there are some free to play with!


horizontal ruler

Peter Farrow
Home: 	01249 654183
Fax: 	01249 461 548
Mobile: 	07799605617
Skype: 	peter_farrow
Web: <>

-------------- next part --------------
Skipped content of type multipart/related

More information about the MailScanner mailing list