Tell MailScanner to stop incoming mail

Michael Masse mrm at medicine.wisc.edu
Sat Aug 27 05:16:08 IST 2011


 
 
>>> On 8/26/2011 at 4:27 PM, in message <DA838176-A795-4431-BD4B-E265949B8E8D at fluxlabs.net>, Jeremy McSpadden <jeremy at fluxlabs.net> wrote:

Stop your mta

--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs, Inc
http://www.fluxlabs.net
Endless Solutions
Office : 850-588-4626
Cell : 850-890-2543
Fax : 850-254-2955
 
 
Ok but how does previously accepted and queued up mail continue to process and get distributed to appropriate servers if I do that so that overflowing queues can get caught up?   If I simply stop the MTA (sendmail) then how does mail flow to appropriate servers?
 
Like I said previously:  Mailscanner appears to me like it starts a separate MTA process for incoming email versus a different MTA process for sending email that has been processed.   Does MailScanner give the option of not starting up the incoming MTA and only running the processing/sending MTA?  Using iptables to block port 25 does block incoming emails, but seems to cause other problems so that processing/sending already queued up mail doesn't work either.    If I could simply get MailScanner to temporarily not start up the incoming MTA (Sendmail) that would seemingly solve my problem.  If MailScanner doesn't give the option per se, can I somehow force MailScanner to not start up the incoming MTA process?   Maybe I'm looking at this all wrong, but essentially here is what I want to do:  I have other servers that can respond to the same mx record lookup and when this server is having problems with it's incoming queue getting overloaded I want to manually tell it to stop accepting new mail so that it can process what it already has accepted.    Other servers that respond to the same MX scope should take up the slack for new email, while hopefully I can get this one to process an overflowing queue and reduce it to a manageable size.      Regarding WHY this is happening in the first place is a separate issue that I'm trying to figure out.    In the mean time I need a workaround to keep email from queuing up on this server and taking forever to process.
 
-Mike


>>> On 8/26/2011 at 4:27 PM, in message <DA838176-A795-4431-BD4B-E265949B8E8D at fluxlabs.net>, Jeremy McSpadden <jeremy at fluxlabs.net> wrote:

Stop your mta

--
Jeremy McSpadden
Flux Labs, Inc
http://www.fluxlabs.net
Endless Solutions
Office : 850-588-4626
Cell : 850-890-2543
Fax : 850-254-2955
 


On Aug 26, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Michael Masse <mrm at medicine.wisc.edu> wrote:

> I'm having performance issues on one of my incoming email servers, and while I'm trying to figure out the root of that problem I need to be able to tell MailScanner to stop accepting incoming mail so that it can get caught up on the email it has already accepted and queued up.   I have multiple servers running w/ this mx record, so senders should just find a different server to send to automatically if this one stops accepting.    It appears to me that MailScanner starts a secondary sendmail process specifically just for receiving email vs sending, so hopefully there's some sort of startup command that would allow me to not accept new email.    I've tried just blocking port 25 from the outside on this server specifically via iptables, and it does prevent outside systems from sending mail, it also keeps MailScanner from properly processing queued up mail for some reason.      Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>  
> -Mike
>  
> -- 
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
> 
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> 
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website! 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20110826/0235cc4e/attachment.html


More information about the MailScanner mailing list