Non Spam actions problem

[Julian Field]

On 29/11/2010 18:19, Kevin Miller wrote:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>
>> It might be a lot less coding to just add a note stating that it is
>> case sensitive... You already have so much to do, why play in the
>> code for this?
> I agree.  It already says it must end in .rules.  That implies there's something going on internally that is looking for a .rules extension, not just a match to the filename in MailScanner.conf.
>
> What's next, accomodating 'leet haxors' so that .Roolz works too? :-)
Don't worry, I'm certainly not allowing that! The 'leet haxor' type are 
a bunch of pathetic amateurs in my book. :-)
> As they say, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it".
It was a 3 character modification to 3 lines of code, just changing "r" 
to "[Rr]". Only took me 2 minutes to do :-)

Jules

-- 
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

Need help customising MailScanner?
Contact me!
Need help fixing or optimising your systems?
Contact me!
Need help getting you started solving new requirements from your boss?
Contact me!

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
Follow me at twitter.com/JulesFM and twitter.com/MailScanner


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.