Non Spam actions problem

[Søren Dam]

2010/11/25 Hugo van der Kooij <hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org>

> On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:20:05 +0100, Søren Dam <post at damschott.dk> wrote:
>
>  When I did that test you proposed, Mailscanner couldn't read the rules
> file. Then I changed the file name from "Non.SpamAction.*Rules*" to
> "Non.SpamAction.*rules" *That helped!
>  This is properly common knowledge if you read the Mailscanner book, which
> i will buy now..;-)
>  /Soeren
>
> Sounds more like common unix knowledge. Things are case sensetive untill
> proven otherwise.
>
> Hugo.
>
> No..thats NOT common UNIX knowledge..
I'm fully aware of case sensitivity..
I named the entry in the Mailscanner.conf the EXACT same way as the .rules
file. But it does simply not work if you name a something.rules file
something.Rules. Try it out!

That is NOT normal i would say..

/Soeren

> -- hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org   http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
> PGP/GPG <http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/PGP/GPG>? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
>
>
> --
> This mail was scanned by BitDefender
> For more information please visit
> http://www.bitdefender.com/links/en/frams.html
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20101125/171e0fea/attachment.html