Virus scanners able to run as a daemon?

[Alex Neuman]

They don't "see it" that way. They "see it" as a "per e-mail address"
(not even per mailbox) thing. Just as they have every right to see
"their" point of view as "correct", you have every right to believe
your point of view.

FWIW I happen to agree with *you*, but I recognize their right to sell
(or not sell) their software as they see fit, just as I recognize your
right to take your business elsewhere, such as with ClamAV.

Which I also like better, for other reasons.

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Peter Bonivart <bonivart at opencsw.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net> wrote:
>> Actually, the price is not right, you need to pay per address regardless, we
>> had argument with them over this on a sec mx server
>> where we had to guess, and assumed if we had 100K users on primary, we'd
>> have to pay for 100K on primary AND another 100K license for secondary,
>> rather than the far cheaper file server license for sec MX, end result, we
>> told em to shove it and use clamav everywhere.
>
> What do you mean per user? I'm only interested in a file scanner, no
> integration with the mail server software. When looking at their
> products it looks like the file scanner for $299/year fits the bill.
>
> /peter
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>



-- 
--

Alex Neuman van der Hans
Reliant Technologies
+507 6781-9505
+507 202-1525
BB Pin: 20EA17C5
alex at rtpty.com
Skype: alexneuman