MailScanner performance issues

[Zaeem Arshad]

On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Lyndon Labuschagne
<lyndonl at mexcom.co.za> wrote:
> Im not sure if you have this enabled but it might help
>
> # Do you want to log the processing speed for each section of the code
> # for a batch? This can be very useful for diagnosing speed problems,
> # particularly in spam checking.
> Log Speed = yes
>

This is enabled. I was wondering if there is a more detailed debugging
available that could log the speeds at each step of the scanning
process.


>
> On 12 Nov 2010, at 8:55 AM, Zaeem Arshad wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Martin Hepworth <maxsec at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> do you :
>>>
>>> reject invalid recipients on the incoming postfix
>>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>> only run a few RBL's in Spamassassin?
>> No RBLs in SpamAssassin. All RBL checks are run in postfix
>>
>>>
>>> run a local caching nameserver?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>>
>>> looked at the tuning/performance stuff in the wiki for clues?
>>
>> Yes. Infact, I have been using MailScanner for a high volume site
>> (6million emails per day) for over a year now without any problems. Is
>> there any way to debug how much time each MailScanner step is taking?
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Zaeem
>> --
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>
>> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>>
>> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>