Attempt to hide real filename extension?

[Timothy Barhorst]

-----Original Message-----
From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Jules Field
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 4:26 PM
To: MailScanner discussion
Subject: Re: Attempt to hide real filename extension?

On 10/05/2010 20:59, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
>> How dangerous is this now? I get a lot of mails blocked because of this rule, do I need it?
>>    
I certainly wouldn't remove it from my system. But then I'm likely to be 
biased :-)
>> If not, what is the best way to relax this rule?
>>   

 
>You can just comment it out or delete it from filename.rules.conf and 
>the "archives.filename.rules.conf" equivalent if you have one. Then 
>"service MailScanner reload" to force it to re-read its configuration files.

>Jules

What would the preferred method be to allow double or triple extensions through for just a particular domain?


 



-- 
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

Need help customising MailScanner?
Contact me!
Need help fixing or optimising your systems?
Contact me!
Need help getting you started solving new requirements from your boss?
Contact me!

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
Follow me at twitter.com/JulesFM and twitter.com/MailScanner


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!