Making bayesian filter detect some new spam

[Scott Silva]

on 6-24-2010 8:13 AM Peter Bonivart spake the following:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Scott Silva <ssilva at sgvwater.com> wrote:
>> It hit on bayes_50. Your system has that score set to 0.00
> 
> Isn't it reasonable to score that as zero? Bayes thinks it's 50%
> chance it's spam (or 50% chance it's ham). To me that's worth 0.00.
> 
I was just saying that it did hit bayes. He needs to spend more time training his.