Making bayesian filter detect some new spam

Scott Silva ssilva at
Thu Jun 24 16:23:02 IST 2010

on 6-24-2010 8:13 AM Peter Bonivart spake the following:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Scott Silva <ssilva at> wrote:
>> It hit on bayes_50. Your system has that score set to 0.00
> Isn't it reasonable to score that as zero? Bayes thinks it's 50%
> chance it's spam (or 50% chance it's ham). To me that's worth 0.00.
I was just saying that it did hit bayes. He needs to spend more time training his.

More information about the MailScanner mailing list