Problems with the latest 4.80.7-1 MS

[Michael Mansour]

Hi Mogens,

--- On Sun, 20/6/10, Mogens Melander <mogens at fumlersoft.dk> wrote:

> From: Mogens Melander <mogens at fumlersoft.dk>
> Subject: Re: Problems with the latest 4.80.7-1 MS
> To: "MailScanner discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> Received: Sunday, 20 June, 2010, 1:40 PM
> Hi
> 
> The "Could not read file /deleted.content.message" suggest
> that your %report-dir% is empty.

Agreed, but it's definately not empty. Has all the required files in there MS 4.80.7 just isn't picking them up.

Note that I performed an upgrade from 4.79.11, not a new installation, the reports are picked up fine in 4.79.11 and the rulesets are also read fine with variables. 

I also have about 9 or more MS servers around and did the upgrade on only one of them. When I downgraded back to 4.79.11, all worked fine again.

Regards,

Michael.

> On Sun, June 20, 2010 00:57, Michael Mansour wrote:
> > Hi Noel,
> >
> > --- On Sun, 20/6/10, Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net>
> wrote:
> >
> > From: Noel Butler <noel.butler at ausics.net>
> > Subject: Re: Problems with the latest 4.80.7-1 MS
> > To: "MailScanner discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> > Received: Sunday, 20 June, 2010, 8:07 AM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 2010-06-19 at 14:59 -0700, Michael Mansour
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've just upgraded one of my mail servers to this
> version, and running a MailScanner --lint gives
> > me hundreds of these errors:
> >
> > Could not read file
> /deleted.content.message.example.com.au.txt at
> > /usr/lib/MailScanner/MailScanner/Config.pm line 2851
> > Syntax error in line 1 of ruleset file
> /etc/MailScanner/rules/deleted.content.message.report.rules
> > at /usr/lib/MailScanner/MailScanner/Config.pm line
> 2798
> >
> > and the ruleset file is simply:
> >
> > To:     *@example2.com.au 
>      
> %report-dir%/deleted.content.message.example.com.au.txt
> >
> > I have multiple reports configured so there hundreds
> more of these type of errors on the lint.
> >
> > If I revert back to the older MS 4.79.11, things work
> fine again.
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hrm, do you use inline spam warning txt? have you ever
> found that when it addresses the recipients
> > on hit messages, it addresses everyone of them like a
> large CC in the message (I see this since
> > kernel announce msgs were tagged.) but in the envelope
> To header there's only the actual
> > recipient.
> >
> >
> >
> > rather strange, oh well... its only been complained
> about on my private domain, not the commercial
> > servers (as far as i know) if many more complain we'll
> cease to use this feature.
> >
> >
> > I don't use the inline spam warning no. I'm not sure
> what that would have to do with the error
> > above, but it turned out that the variable in the
> ruleset was the problem.
> >
> > I'm downgrading back to the earlier version.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Michael.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
> > --
> > MailScanner mailing list
> > mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> > http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
> >
> > Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> >
> > Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the
> website!
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Later
> 
> Mogens Melander
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> -- 
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
> 
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> 
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the
> website! 
>