Upgrade to 4.79.11
derek.winkler at algorithmics.com
derek.winkler at algorithmics.com
Thu Jul 22 15:36:13 IST 2010
Solved.
When running SpamAssassin debug from MailScanner,
16:34:39 Jul 21 16:34:39.138 [20343] dbg: generic: Perl 5.008005,
PREFIX=/usr, DEF_RULES_DIR=/usr/share/spamassassin,
LOCAL_RULES_DIR=/etc/mail/spamassassin, LOCAL_STATE_DIR=/var/lib
When running SpamAssassin debug from command line,
Jul 21 13:34:40.776 [23659] dbg: generic: Perl 5.008005, PREFIX=/usr,
DEF_RULES_DIR=/usr/share/spamassassin,
LOCAL_RULES_DIR=/etc/mail/spamassassin,
LOCAL_STATE_DIR=/var/lib/spamassassin
Had to modify MailScanner.conf,
SpamAssassin Local State Dir = /var/lib
To
SpamAssassin Local State Dir = /var/lib/spamassassin
Did I jump too many versions for upgrade_MailScanner_conf to handle? Or
does it need special case handling since its commented out by default?
From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
[mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of
derek.winkler at algorithmics.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 3:15 PM
To: mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
Subject: Upgrade to 4.79.11
I just upgraded from 4.69.9 to 4.79.11, SA from 3.2.5 to SA 3.3.1.
Everything lints fine, can't find any problems.
I'm getting spam that when processed by MS scores quite low,
X-Algo-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0.5,
required 4.5, autolearn=disabled, RCVD_IN_BRBL 0.50)
but when tested with SA within minutes on the same server scores quite
high,
Content analysis details: (23.7 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
0.5 RCVD_IN_BRBL RBL: Received via a relay in BRBL
[198.7.242.169 listed in
b.barracudacentral.org]
1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net
[Blocked - see
<http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?198.7.242.169>]
1.6 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT
[198.7.242.169 listed in
bb.barracudacentral.org]
0.7 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
[198.7.242.169 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
[198.7.242.169 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
4.5 URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the AB SURBL
blocklist
[URIs: erectgardiner81b.ru]
1.7 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL
blocklist
[URIs: erectgardiner81b.ru]
1.9 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL
blocklist
[URIs: erectgardiner81b.ru]
1.7 URIBL_DBL_SPAM Contains an URL listed in the DBL blocklist
[URIs: erectgardiner81b.ru]
-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover
relay
domain
0.9 SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL SPF: HELO does not match SPF record
(softfail)
0.6 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
[URIs: erectgardiner81b.ru]
0.0 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32 BODY: HTML: images with 2800-3200 bytes of
words
0.6 HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04 BODY: HTML has a low ratio of text to image
area
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
1.7 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
2.4 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E8_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 8 confidence level
above 50%
[cf: 100]
0.4 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
[cf: 100]
0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with
dynamic-looking rDNS
0.0 T_SURBL_MULTI2 T_SURBL_MULTI2
0.0 T_SURBL_MULTI1 T_SURBL_MULTI1
Any ideas why?
Using Sendmail on RHEL4.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20100722/0c359cd9/attachment.html
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list