Office 2007

Julian Field MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tue Jan 12 10:11:18 GMT 2010


Please find one of the offending messages, stop your MailScanner, put it 
on its own in the queue and run "MailScanner --debug" and then email me 
the output (or post it here). I don't have Perl 5.10 so can't reproduce 
these problems myself.

Many thanks!
Jules.

On 11/01/2010 21:30, Garrod M. Alwood wrote:
> Sure, no problem. I have the newest 4.79.5-1 mailscanner installed 
> (fixed a few filetypes), Ubuntu 9.10, Perl 5.10 and when someone sends 
> xlsx and docx files, the email doesn't send and gets repeatedly 
> attempted to send and after 6 tries it kills the emails and logs it as 
> a Emal attempted to kill MailScanner. I have the office 2007 documents 
> in the filetype and filename rules marked as ok (I know that probably 
> doesn't matter for this, but wanted to give more than enough info.) I 
> have watched my log files as one comes in and it keeps trying and it 
> just can't do anything with it and the bad part is I can't see what 
> exactly is causing the error.
> Garrod M. Alwood
> Consultant
> garrod.alwood at lorodoes.com <mailto:garrod.alwood at lorodoes.com>
> 904.738.4988
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info 
> [mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Hugo van der 
> Kooij [hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org]
> *Sent:* Monday, January 11, 2010 4:26 PM
> *To:* mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> *Subject:* Re: Office 2007
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/01/10 22:01, Garrod M. Alwood wrote:
> > Hey, I was wondering if anyone else is having trouble with office 2007
> > files attempting to kill MailScanner? I'm not sure if this part of the
> > taint issue or not, but can somebody please advise?
>
> Can you explain what you see happening? And I am sure there is something
> of an OS installed and some version details would go nicely with that as
> well.
>
> Hugo. (Or as James T. Kirk said it: I never trusted consultants, I guess
> I never will. ;-) )
>
> - -- 
> hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
> PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
>
>         A: Yes.
> >Q: Are you sure?
> >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
>
> Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAktLl3IACgkQBvzDRVjxmYGAsQCglFf3QwmuyMy2aCAZIwJ1O1x8
> OR4AnRCAc1DIbycjFkuiTv9JOcZMaBtP
> =tkYu
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> -- 
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!

Jules

-- 
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

Need help customising MailScanner?
Contact me!
Need help fixing or optimising your systems?
Contact me!
Need help getting you started solving new requirements from your boss?
Contact me!

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
Follow me at twitter.com/JulesFM and twitter.com/MailScanner


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the MailScanner mailing list