Multiple inline html signatures

[BlaaT 0001]

Allow Multiple HTML Signatures = no
No, that makes no difference.

I do notice in our e-mails the following line:

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

Our outgoing mails are send in both text format and html format (in 1 message).

Example mail format:


Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<the email in plain text format here>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format...

------------=_1266241617-27606-1
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<the email in html format here>



I don't know if this breaks things? Is this a normal way of formatting emails?

I noticed MailScanner has problems scanning the body of our mails.
Watermarking also doesn't work as expected. NDR reports with valid
watermarks are tagged as "no valid watermark" and the spamscore is
raised to reflect this.

Any other ideas?

Thanks.


On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Julian Field
<MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> Looks like I said "yes" in that explanation in the docs when I meant "no",
> for "Allow Multiple HTML Signatures".
> Does it then work?
>
> Jules.
>
> On 13/02/2010 18:40, BlaaT 0001 wrote:
>>
>> Hello everybody,