bug report

[--[ UxBoD ]--]

Instead of checking Amavis or MailScanner what happens when you run the message directly through SA ? 

-- 
Thanks, Phil 
ps: Top posting as Pete did :) 

----- "Ying" <yingyang at exemail.com.au> wrote: 



I show respect, I did by private bug report, but I get told I need to read documentation, I am no newby, but alas mailscanner dev think so, so I ask myself why waste my time with bug report when not welcome, I have private mail too by someone who has similar problem, they say run slackware, we run debian, he think it because run latest perl modules. but why I care now after mailscanner dev response. my 5 yo son could tell the answers from amavisd is different to what mailscanner be. 

So sorry for wasting my time, wont report bugs anymore here 



----- Original Message ----- 
From: Peter Farrow 
To: MailScanner discussion 
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 11:08 AM 
Subject: Re: bug report 

Ying: 

Show some respect here, I am sure Jules would have read your bug report, so no need to adopt that tone. 

If you want help from someone its good start to be on your best behaviour, no one this list has an obligation to help you, please remember that when you type your replies. 

regards 

Pete 
ps: I am top posting because this thread is in that format. 

On 09/02/2010 23:52, Ying wrote: 


Hello, 
Did you even read my report? 

I state it work with spamassassin directly, it work with amavisd, it work with mailscanner until SA upgrade. so very obviously SA works as all read /etc/postfix/spamassassin/*, just not properly with mailscanner anymore, do you treat everyone like this and dismiss out of hand without reading or comprehend what said or investigate? 

and yes /etc/postfix is symlink to /etc/mail, else amavisd would not work. 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Jules Field 
To: Ying 
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 6:29 PM 
Subject: Re: bug report 

If it is not doing the tests, then you have not enabled them in the /etc/mail/spamassassin/v*.pre files. 
This is not a MailScanner problem, I suggest you read the SA documentation. 

On 09/02/2010 02:29, Ying wrote: 




BUG REPORT 

MailScanner does not do many SpamAssassin tests, this is local rules and 

URI tests, eg: .multi.uribl.com and all others 

Problem only notice after upgrade SA 3.2.5 to 3.3.0. MailScanner work fine 

for many month with same configuration even from last version which also has 

this problem. In testing we even remove all the whitelists. 



MailScanner-4.79.11-1 source install 

SpamAssassin 3.3.0 from CPAN 

Perl Modules - all required installed and update from CPAN 

MailScanner and SpamAssassin both --lint OK 

MailScanner run as user postfix 

amavisd-new run as user vscan 

/etc/postfix/spamassasin owner is root directory is 0755 

Unreproducable by spamassasin -t < queue file 

Unreproducable by amavisd-new 

both of these tests score as expected. 

Monitor of Bind show MailScanner does not ask URI questions 

also scan real fast and not asking Razor or DCC 





Using MailScanner and amavisd-new together, MailScanner take message 

first before amavisd-new. 

MailScanner say- 

X-YUKI-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0, 

required 3, autolearn=disabled) 

amavisd-new say- 

X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at YUKI 

X-Spam-Flag: NO 

X-Spam-Score: 1.313 

X-Spam-Level: * 

X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.313 tagged_above=-999 required=3 

tests=[URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled 


Jules

-- 
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng www.MailScanner.info Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store Need help customising MailScanner?
Contact me!
Need help fixing or optimising your systems?
Contact me!
Need help getting you started solving new requirements from your boss?
Contact me!

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
Follow me at twitter.com/JulesFM and twitter.com/MailScanner 
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner , and is 
believed to be clean. 
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by the Inexcom system scanner, 
and is believed to be clean. 
Advanced heuristic mail scanning server [-]. 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by the Inexcom system scanner, 
and is believed to be clean. 
Advanced heuristic mail scanning server [-]. 




-- 
MailScanner mailing list 
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info 
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner 

Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting 

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website! 

-- 
MailScanner mailing list 
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info 
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner 

Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting 

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website! 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20100210/55fe8b43/attachment-0001.html