Fun with my own spamassassin filter: slow reacting?

[Martin Hepworth]

You can always just stop mailscanner, delete the cache and restart
mailscanner, it is just a cache after all.


-- 
Martin Hepworth
Oxford, UK

2009/9/1 Mauricio Tavares <raubvogel at gmail.com>

> Randal, Phil wrote:
>
>> The old score was being cached in MailScanner's spamassassin results
>> cache.
>>
>>         Aha. Is there a way to flush it, so it is forced to read the new
> values in?
>
>
>  Cheers,
>>
>> Phil
>>
>> --
>> Phil Randal | Networks Engineer
>> NHS Herefordshire & Herefordshire Council  | Deputy Chief Executive's
>> Office | I.C.T. Services Division
>> Thorn Office Centre, Rotherwas, Hereford, HR2 6JT
>> Tel: 01432 260160
>> email: prandal at herefordshire.gov.uk
>>
>> Any opinion expressed in this e-mail or any attached files are those of
>> the individual and not necessarily those of Herefordshire Council.
>>
>> This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
>> for the use of the addressee. This communication may contain material
>> protected by law from being passed on. If you are not the intended
>> recipient and have received this e-mail in error, you are advised that
>> any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail
>> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please
>> contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies of it.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
>> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of
>> Mauricio Tavares
>> Sent: 01 September 2009 14:18
>> To: MailScanner discussion
>> Subject: Fun with my own spamassassin filter: slow reacting?
>>
>>
>>        Trying to write a filter that would look for a header beginning
>> with a specific text and give me a score based on that. So, after
>> reading http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WritingRules I edit
>> spam.assassin.prefs.conf and add the following:
>>
>> header LOCAL_TEST Test-Header =~ /Strange Pork/ score LOCAL_TEST  -1.000
>>
>> then reload MailScanner and send a test email with that header. I check
>> the header and it seems to have found the header and graded it as it
>> should:
>>
>> not spam, SpamAssassin (cached, score=1.694,    required 4.7,
>> BASE64_LENGTH_79_INF 1.50, BAYES_05 -1.11,      FH_HELO_ENDS_DOT 2.31,
>> LOCAL_TEST -1.00)
>>
>> So, just for the fun of it, I decrease the score to -3, reload
>> MailScanner, and send the test email. I am still getting -1 as the score
>> for LOCAL_TEST. I try restarting it and get the same results.
>>
>> Today, I try it again, not having touched the mail server since that
>> last attempt. Now it properly reports the new score for LOCAL_TEST:
>>
>> not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-0.306,       required 4.7,
>> BASE64_LENGTH_79_INF 1.50, BAYES_05 -1.11,      FH_HELO_ENDS_DOT 2.31,
>> LOCAL_TEST -3.00)
>>
>> Is it me who missed some step here or it is just slow to update itself?
>>
>> --
>> MailScanner mailing list
>> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
>> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>>
>> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>>
>> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20090901/511c5cac/attachment.html