(2nd Request) Disable scanning for a client that connectsviaSMTP-AUTH

[Glenn Steen]

2009/5/25 Eli Wapniarski <eli at orbsky.homelinux.org>:
> I still think this is a very very bad idea but why not use a list of full email addresses instead of just the domain. That is FROM: user1 at domain.com FROM: user2 at domain.com etc. Do yourself a favor. If possible set up an effective MailScanner Instalation over on the server at Business B.
>
> El

Because those are as easily forged? That would be my reason to not do
it that way.

Gary, I'm a PF type too, and can think of numerous ways of bypassing
MS with that, but... that's no help to you:-)... I do know that this
topic has been touched before (IIRC numerous times), although then
mostly for roadrunners/roaming users needing to relay through the MS
host. Try a little list searchuing over at Gmane ... Scott Silva
(among others) have this for Sendmail.

> On Monday 25 May 2009 04:46:22 Gary Faith wrote:
>> Business A - ISP located in a co-lo with fast internet and static IP's.  It does web hosting, dial-up internet and mail scanning.
>>
>> Business B & My Personal Internet - Used to be a T1 with static IPs but is now a third party sucky Dynamic DSL.  Now that it is dynamic DSL, I need to relay this mail through the mail scanner at Business A without the other people I have designated as MailWatch Admins in Business A, having the ability see this e-mail at all.  I have an account in the mail scanner setup so I can do SMTP AUTH with TLS.  That works great but ALL incoming mail is scanned unless I add FROM: domain.com no to the scan.messages.rules.  When I do that I get spam from outside sources because it isn't being scanned.
>>
>> I need a sendmail or mailscanner option so that I can bypass scanning for the e-mail from this source only!
>>
>> Gary
>>
(snip)

Cheers
-- 
-- Glenn
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se