(2nd Request) Disable scanning for a client that
glenn.steen at gmail.com
Wed May 27 10:19:36 IST 2009
2009/5/25 Eli Wapniarski <eli at orbsky.homelinux.org>:
> I still think this is a very very bad idea but why not use a list of full email addresses instead of just the domain. That is FROM: user1 at domain.com FROM: user2 at domain.com etc. Do yourself a favor. If possible set up an effective MailScanner Instalation over on the server at Business B.
Because those are as easily forged? That would be my reason to not do
it that way.
Gary, I'm a PF type too, and can think of numerous ways of bypassing
MS with that, but... that's no help to you:-)... I do know that this
topic has been touched before (IIRC numerous times), although then
mostly for roadrunners/roaming users needing to relay through the MS
host. Try a little list searchuing over at Gmane ... Scott Silva
(among others) have this for Sendmail.
> On Monday 25 May 2009 04:46:22 Gary Faith wrote:
>> Business A - ISP located in a co-lo with fast internet and static IP's. It does web hosting, dial-up internet and mail scanning.
>> Business B & My Personal Internet - Used to be a T1 with static IPs but is now a third party sucky Dynamic DSL. Now that it is dynamic DSL, I need to relay this mail through the mail scanner at Business A without the other people I have designated as MailWatch Admins in Business A, having the ability see this e-mail at all. I have an account in the mail scanner setup so I can do SMTP AUTH with TLS. That works great but ALL incoming mail is scanned unless I add FROM: domain.com no to the scan.messages.rules. When I do that I get spam from outside sources because it isn't being scanned.
>> I need a sendmail or mailscanner option so that I can bypass scanning for the e-mail from this source only!
email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se
More information about the MailScanner