clamavmodule or clamd ?

[Randal, Phil]

In my experience, it's much better with clamd.

Cheers,

Phil
--
Phil Randal | Networks Engineer
Herefordshire Council | Deputy Chief Executive's Office | I.C.T.
Services Division
Thorn Office Centre, Rotherwas, Hereford, HR2 6JT
Tel: 01432 260160
email: prandal at herefordshire.gov.uk

Any opinion expressed in this e-mail or any attached files are those of
the individual and not necessarily those of Herefordshire Council.

This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for the use of the addressee. This communication may contain material
protected by law from being passed on. If you are not the intended
recipient and have received this e-mail in error, you are advised that
any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please
contact the sender immediately and destroy all copies of it.

-----Original Message-----
From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
[mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Eddie
Hallahan
Sent: 31 March 2009 14:15
To: MailScanner discussion
Subject: clamavmodule or clamd ?

Hi all,

We currently run a chunk of servers and am having real grief with the
perl clamav module.  Our servers currently use clamavmodule in their
scanning.  What would be the issues if we switched to clamd - i.e. would
this slow things down/speed them up, not make a difference?

Regards

--
Eddie Hallahan
Enterprise Management Consulting
www.emcuk.com

Enterprise Management Consulting is a company registered in England and
Wales with company number 3134544. VAT registration number is 681038440.

--
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!