Received: header and Mark Unscanned Message problem
MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Fri Mar 27 09:47:00 GMT 2009
On 27/3/09 01:21, vg_us at hotmail.com wrote:
> From: "Julian Field" <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk>
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 9:14 PM
> To: "MailScanner discussion" <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> Subject: Re: Received: header and Mark Unscanned Message problem
>> On 3/27/09 12:24 AM, vg_us at hotmail.com wrote:
>>> I have a problem delivering to one of the sites: mail gets rejected
>>> because "Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service
>>> Provider for details" added to Received: header is not RFC compliant
>>> (according to that site's postmaster).
>> Something's wrong in that case, MailScanner should never touch any
>> Received: header, under the default shipped settings. That text
>> should go in the X-MailScanner: header where it is legit.
>>> When I disable Mark Unscanned Messages and set "Unscanned Header
>>> Value =", mailscanner still inserts a "," after original header and
>>> my mail is rejected again.
>>> Is there any way to make sure mailscanner doesn't touch Received:
>>> header at all?
>> Please try it with a default MailScanner.conf and see if it still
>> does it. It shouldn't, and I don't believe it does on other people's
> we'll do. is it possible this happened because of config file format
> changes between my rpm upgrades?
That shouldn't cause it, no.
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
Need help customising MailScanner?
Need help fixing or optimising your systems?
Need help getting you started solving new requirements from your boss?
PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the MailScanner