Spamassassin cache in mysql - feature request
Jonas Akrouh Larsen
jonas at vrt.dk
Tue Mar 17 15:42:26 GMT 2009
> IMHO running the cache.db in tmpfs (on ram) should be faster than
> mysql over tcp, however it depends on your configuration. just a
> balance between pros/cons.
I think you missed the point, i think we can all agree the sqllite db on
tmpfs is faster, but if u can share the cache between ur nodes, you should
have a higher cache hit ratio as far as I can figure.
Whether or not this cache hit ratio increase is worth the penalty of
querying a central sql server is the question I guess.
Even if you got a replication setup, so you query the sql server running on
the local host, it will still be slower than sqllite on tmpfs.
My 5 cents.
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
Jonas Akrouh Larsen
TechBiz ApS
Laplandsgade 4, 2. sal
2300 København S
Office: 7020 0979
Direct: 3336 9974
Mobile: 5120 1096
Fax: 7020 0978
Web: www.techbiz.dk
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list