How to Remove X-headers

Hugo van der Kooij hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org
Fri Mar 13 21:29:29 GMT 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Randal, Phil wrote:
> We've hit the same issue this week.
> 
> The relevant Microsoft documentation is here:
> 
> Understanding the Impact of Named Property and Replica Identifier Limits
> on Exchange Databases
> 
> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb851492.aspx
> 
> Events 9666, 9667, 9668, and 9669 Received When Named Properties or
> Replica Identifiers Are Depleted for An Exchange Database
> 
> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb851495.aspx 
> 
> Note how Microsoft has completely lost the plot on this one, and fails
> to understand that there could be any number of unique X- header lines,
> not just their arbitrary limit of at most 327766 "Named properties".

So if I start adding randomness to my headers and send out enough email
to an exchange server I will get the Exchange admin into a tight spot?

I must say I almost feel tempted to install just such a scheme to hit on
Microsoft admins worldwide ;-)

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkm60DcACgkQBvzDRVjxmYH/IwCcD9udEwYwxdB6EHmyOlrxobc4
puAAniHGck+57I0fuyRGnU6ruVeAQcCK
=ixmU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the MailScanner mailing list