How to Remove X-headers

[Alex Broens]

On 3/12/2009 12:34 PM, Glenn Steen wrote:
> 2009/3/12 Alex Broens <ms-list at alexb.ch>:
>> On 3/12/2009 11:07 AM, Randal, Phil wrote:
>>> We've hit the same issue this week.
>>>
>>> The relevant Microsoft documentation is here:
>>>
>>> Understanding the Impact of Named Property and Replica Identifier Limits
>>> on Exchange Databases
>>>
>>> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb851492.aspx
>>>
>>> Events 9666, 9667, 9668, and 9669 Received When Named Properties or
>>> Replica Identifiers Are Depleted for An Exchange Database
>>>
>>> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb851495.aspx
>>> Note how Microsoft has completely lost the plot on this one, and fails
>>> to understand that there could be any number of unique X- header lines,
>>> not just their arbitrary limit of at most 327766 "Named properties".
>> BIG LAUGH! whoever came up with this scheme should be sued.. na.. better:
>> shot!
>>
>> whatever... I wouldn't play with mime headers but start eliminating
>> unnecesssary MailScanner Organisation etc headers, bulker's X- tracking
>> headers, List mail bloat, yahoo groups bloat, etc etc.
>>
>> playing with MUA Mime headers and OLE/etc is definitely the VERY wrong way
>> to go.
>>
>> Alex
>> PS: Long live real *mail* storage platforms.
>>
> Unbeleivable. Sigh. But then ... M$ never had the plot to lose, now did they?:-)

     655360 bytes total conventional memory
     655360 bytes available to MS-DOS
     627552 largest executable program size

    1048576 bytes total contiguous extended memory
          0 bytes available contiguous extended memory
     941056 bytes available XMS memory
            MS-DOS resident in High Memory Area


does this ring any bell?

:-)