Mismatch between report and actions
rlopezcnm at gmail.com
Mon Jun 29 15:26:37 IST 2009
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Glenn Steen<glenn.steen at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/6/29 Robert Lopez <rlopezcnm at gmail.com>:
>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Glenn Steen<glenn.steen at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 2009/6/26 Robert Lopez <rlopezcnm at gmail.com>:
>>>> HP Prolient DL360 G5
>>>> Two dual core Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5450 @ 3.00GHz
>>>> 8 G RAM
>>>> Linux 2.6.28-11-server #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 17 02:45:36 UTC 2009
>>>> x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>>> Ubuntu 9.04 (jaunty)
>>>> MailScanner version 4.74.16
>>>> Postfix version 2.5.5
>>>> SpamAssassin version 3.2.5 running on Perl version 5.10.0
>>>> (I know there are newer versions. These are Ubuntu apt-get...)
> (snip error...)
>>> Do the upgrades needed ... MailScanner, possibly SA and Clam as well.
>>> If this means leaving the Ubunto/apt thing behind, then so be it.
>>> If you still observe the same behavior... Then we'll look at other things:-).
>> Thank you Glenn,
>> Changing from Ubuntu is not my decision to make. My current project is
>> comparing a system built with RHEL and files from Julians site to this
> I didn't say "ditch Ubuntu", just the ubuntu packaging of
> MailScanner;-). You could probably live pritty well with the source
> tarball, for example.
> -- Glenn
> email: glenn < dot > steen < at > gmail < dot > com
> work: glenn < dot > steen < at > ap1 < dot > se
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
Again, Thank you Glenn.
I have to attend to the root cause of the problem I wrote about. The
issue you reply to is a policy issue upon which I have no influence. I
was very happy with the test system built with tar files. My
management is not.
Unix Systems Administrator
Central New Mexico Community College (CNM)
525 Buena Vista SE
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106
More information about the MailScanner