Performance numbers for a DELL R710

Zaeem Arshad zaeem.arshad at
Thu Jun 4 20:25:19 IST 2009

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Steve Freegard <steve.freegard at>wrote:

> Twiddling with the filesystem used is only going to bring marginal gains
> on your actual scan times which if you want to achieve 65 message/sec is
> where you need to focus your efforts first.
> I've seen XFS consistently come last in several benchmarks for mail
> server type traffic. See for a
> review of filesystems I read yesterday.

I have had good results so far with XFS. I am willing to give NILFS a spin.
Anyone else can vouch for it? Every last bit of performance that can be
extracted from a system matters. Looking forward for further input in this


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

More information about the MailScanner mailing list