Performance numbers for a DELL R710
zaeem.arshad at gmail.com
Thu Jun 4 20:25:19 IST 2009
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Steve Freegard <steve.freegard at fsl.com>wrote:
> Twiddling with the filesystem used is only going to bring marginal gains
> on your actual scan times which if you want to achieve 65 message/sec is
> where you need to focus your efforts first.
> I've seen XFS consistently come last in several benchmarks for mail
> server type traffic. See http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7345/2/ for a
> review of filesystems I read yesterday.
I have had good results so far with XFS. I am willing to give NILFS a spin.
Anyone else can vouch for it? Every last bit of performance that can be
extracted from a system matters. Looking forward for further input in this
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the MailScanner