Performance numbers for a DELL R710

[Zaeem Arshad]

On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Steve Freegard <steve.freegard at fsl.com>wrote:

>
>
>
> Twiddling with the filesystem used is only going to bring marginal gains
> on your actual scan times which if you want to achieve 65 message/sec is
> where you need to focus your efforts first.
>
> I've seen XFS consistently come last in several benchmarks for mail
> server type traffic. See http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7345/2/ for a
> review of filesystems I read yesterday.
>


I have had good results so far with XFS. I am willing to give NILFS a spin.
Anyone else can vouch for it? Every last bit of performance that can be
extracted from a system matters. Looking forward for further input in this
thread.


Regards

--
Zaeem
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.mailscanner.info/pipermail/mailscanner/attachments/20090605/fd6bafa2/attachment.html