Need help with rule set

[Jonas A. Larsen]

> I wasn't thinking of anything quite so complicated as that.
> Maybe a single score for all defined spam reports from the virus scanners?
> I would rather keep it simple so people can actually use it, than have
> something very clever and complex that no-one ever quite understands or
> can work out how to use (apart from the 0.1% who are wizards).
> 
> Jules.

I must agree with the users who would like to see an "exempt method" or whatever you want to call it, which makes it possible to make MailScanner threat something that clamav (or other scanners) hit on as spam instead of a virus.

So far I have NOT used any 3rd party sigs for clam, for this specific reason. I do not want to block something completely just because a clamav sig hits on it.

If it was possible to define a score for certain virus scanner hits instead it would make mailscanner much more flexible (apparently like amavis supports)

So if this was added to MailScanner it would allow me (and others I'm sure) to utilize 3rd party virus signatures to improve spam protection, without being vulnerable to obvious false positives in the 3rd party sigs.



Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
 
Jonas Akrouh Larsen
 
TechBiz ApS
Laplandsgade 4, 2. sal
2300 København S
 
Office: 7020 0979
Direct: 3336 9974
Mobile: 5120 1096
Fax:    7020 0978
Web: www.techbiz.dk