A false positive?
Robert Lopez
rlopezcnm at gmail.com
Fri Aug 14 22:35:00 IST 2009
The following looks to me as if it is a report of false positive. Does
anyone disagree?
If it is a false positive what should I do to avoid more like it?
> The following e-mails were found to have: Virus Detected
>
> Sender: daily_headlines at ms3.lga2.nytimes.com
> IP Address: 199.239.138.82
> Recipient: xxxxxxxxxx4 at cnm.edu
> Subject: Today's Headlines: New Screening Could Lead to More Potent Cancer Drugs
> MessageID: 0ED79A2E.A6D89
> Quarantine:
> Report: Clamd: message was infected: Phishing.Heuristics.Email.SpoofedDomain
>
> Full headers are:
>
> Received: from content120c.lga2.nytimes.com
> (content120c.lga2.nytimes.com [199.239.138.82])
> by mg05.cnm.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED79A2E
> for <xxxxxxxxxx4 at cnm.edu>; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 03:05:09 -0600 (MDT)
>
> Received: by content120c.lga2.nytimes.com (PowerMTA(TM) v3.5r3) id hgkkc00ho985 for
> <xxxxxxxxxx4 at cnm.edu>; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:04:39 -0400 (envelope-from
> <daily_headlines at ms3.lga2.nytimes.com>)
>
> From: NYTimes.com <nytdirect at nytimes.com>
> Reply-To: nytdirect at nytimes.com
> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:04:44 -0400
> To: xxxxxxxxxx4 at cnm.edu
> X-job: TH-20090814
> Subject: Today's Headlines: New Screening Could Lead to More Potent Cancer Drugs
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
> Mime-version: 1.0
> Message-Id: <20090814090510.0ED79A2E at mg05.cnm.edu>
>
>
> --
> MailScanner
> Email Virus Scanner
> www.mailscanner.info
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner,
> and is believed to be clean.
--
Robert Lopez
Unix Systems Administrator
Central New Mexico Community College (CNM)
525 Buena Vista SE
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list