Mails released from spam quarantine ends up back in quarantine
ecasarero at gmail.com
Fri Apr 24 04:27:09 IST 2009
2009/4/23 jan gestre <ipcopper.ph at gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Eduardo Casarero <ecasarero at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2009/4/23 jan gestre <ipcopper.ph at gmail.com>:
>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Eduardo Casarero <ecasarero at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 2009/4/23 jan gestre <ipcopper.ph at gmail.com>:
>>>>> Hi Guys,
>>>>> I'm trying to release some emails that MailScanner mistakenly tagged
>>>>> as SPAM but after releasing it ends up back in the quarantine. I have
>>>>> "Quarantine Whole Messages As Queue Files = no" and Spam Action set to
>>>>> "store forward email at address" in MailScanner.conf, BTW I can't change
>>>>> the Spam Action as deliver because of the enormous amount of spam in
>>>>> user's inboxes and I'm getting a mouthful if I revert to that, any
>>>> Do you have "localhost (127.0.0.1)" in whitelist? so all releases are
>>>> never spam?
>>> No, I don't have localhost in whitelist, should I add this? I've read
>>> in the documentation that adding your own domain is a no-no, I have no
>>> idea if they are the same.
>> what i say is that all traffic orginated in localhost (the mailscanner
>> server) should be whitelisted (not the domain, just 127.0.0.1, because
>> you never send spam from localhost (i assume).
when you release the email, what is the ip of orgin? localhost or
server ip? (check headers in quarantine) if running mailwatch should
be 127.0.0.1 using the php release rpc.
> should I used the network address instead because the server is
> virtually hosted using a MySQL backend?
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
More information about the MailScanner