Found nn messages in the processing-messages database

Kai Schaetzl maillists at
Mon Apr 20 11:31:20 IST 2009

Julian Field wrote on Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:08:05 +0100:

> No, for everything with Postfix. It will just mean a change in algorithm 
> to produce the 5-digit key, no change in logging, data stored or 
> anything else.

Julian, I would be grateful if you could provide the direct use of the 
postfix ids as an option. I'm not seeing any reason to use them on my 
setups, they do not repeat over a long time. Where are those setups that 
"need" it? In mailing list postings from 5 years ago? I'm still waiting 
that someone raises his hand and says "yes, it repeats for us at least 

And I don't see how changing the algorithm for the five-letter-word would 
solve the problem with the processing database.


Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:

More information about the MailScanner mailing list