Found nn messages in the processing-messages database
    Kai Schaetzl 
    maillists at conactive.com
       
    Mon Apr 20 11:31:20 IST 2009
    
    
  
Julian Field wrote on Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:08:05 +0100:
> No, for everything with Postfix. It will just mean a change in algorithm 
> to produce the 5-digit key, no change in logging, data stored or 
> anything else.
Julian, I would be grateful if you could provide the direct use of the 
postfix ids as an option. I'm not seeing any reason to use them on my 
setups, they do not repeat over a long time. Where are those setups that 
"need" it? In mailing list postings from 5 years ago? I'm still waiting 
that someone raises his hand and says "yes, it repeats for us at least 
daily".
And I don't see how changing the algorithm for the five-letter-word would 
solve the problem with the processing database.
Kai
-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
    
    
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list