Filter incoming mail from
maxsec at gmail.com
Tue Apr 7 16:22:36 IST 2009
2009/4/7 Chuck Rock <carock at epconline.com>
> Kai Schaetzl <maillists <at> conactive.com> writes:
> > Chuck Rock wrote on Thu, 2 Apr 2009 21:28:05 +0000 (UTC):
> > > I'm not using SpamAssassin, just MailScanner with antivirus.
> > However, SA is just for that, so use it. Don't abuse other tools for
> > things they were not made for.
> > Kai
> I can't overload these boxes with extra scanning. MailScanner/Sendmail is
> maxing out CPU and memory and adding SA will make them backlog mail for
> scanning until there's no possible way to catch up.
> They scan about 100 msgs per second and get hit with 1000 messages a second
> sometimes. These are quad Xeon boxes with 6 Gig RAM running clamd and
> MailScanner 4.61.7. Running clamscan instead of clamd used too much CPU for
> them to keep up. I have two identical boxes running with round robin and
> once per year, they will get hit so hard I have to take one out of service
> catch up over 12 hours or so. I can't realistically add another process to
> cpu unless it's going to make up for it somewhere else.
> p.s. bottom posting sucks
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
I'd look at using Barricade MX from those nice folks at FSL to reduce the
load on the servers.
I'd also think about adding in more boxes - ideally if you loose a box the
others should be able to cope with the load and in you're current situation
I doubt that is the case.
Did I mention upgrading MailScanner also - there's a fair bit of speed up in
there, but alot of it is related to SA speed-ups and better clamd support
and the watermarking support.
How are you spam trapping these emails - just relying on RBLs or don't you
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the MailScanner