Improvements to install.sh ?

[Hugo van der Kooij]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

shuttlebox wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Alex Broens <ms-list at alexb.ch> wrote:
>>> Ever try a live upgrade of
>>> a CentOS system or RHEL from 4.x to 5.x?  I wouldn't consider them in
>>> this environment simply because they are that much worse.
>> Never heard of anybody sane and/or sober who does this unless the person is
>> prepared to loose hair, brain cells and possibly a job.
> 
> Funny, in Solaris we do live upgrades all the time so not to risk what
> you just mentioned.  ;-)

I recall that I have once done a Centos 4 to Centos 5 upgrade by just
picking up the version package and let yum take care of the rest

But that was just a proof of concept. Centos 4 will be receiving updates
for quite a while. Unlike the unworkable schedule you are forced to with
Fedora.

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFI38/4BvzDRVjxmYERAo4IAKCqxYnR7EKTPfcGZYmSXgiHpkeuAACfQXqh
nTvunF6YBou3jzvhe+lNA/g=
=ksUG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----