New service - the Team Cymru Malware Hash Registry!

--[ UxBoD ]-- uxbod at splatnix.net
Wed Oct 29 08:17:14 GMT 2008


Cheers for putting me straight Steve ;) Nice explanation aswell :)

Regards,

-- 
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: "curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749

----- "Steve Freegard" <steve.freegard at fsl.com> wrote:

> All the records from the Malware Hash Registry have a TTL of 86400
> 
> seconds (24 hours), so that means that if you're looking up the same
> 
> hash within 24 hours - it will come from your local cache provided it
> 
> hasn't been purged to reclaim space.
> 
> 
> 
> If you maintain a local cache - you really don't save a lot of lookups
> 
> to the upstream since the vast majority of lookups are going to be
> 
> negative lookups (e.g. NXDOMAIN).
> 
> 
> 
> DNS was designed with caching in mind; and it works just fine for the
> 
> purposes it was designed for - adding a second cache is almost always
> a
> 
> bad idea and will introduce lag and incorrect results along with space
> 
> bloat.
> 
> 
> 
> If you're going to argue a local cache for these hashes - why not
> argue
> 
> for local caching for DNS BL or URI BL lookups as well?  The reason we
> 
> don't do local caching for these is exactly the same as why we
> shouldn't
> 
> do it here - the data is fluid - there's no guarantee that a positive
> or
> 
> negative lookup now yield the same result the next time you look at
> the
> 
> data.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Steve.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the MailScanner mailing list