OT Shared Imap folders/accounts

Gareth list-mailscanner at linguaphone.com
Thu Oct 9 15:02:52 IST 2008


I second the suggestion of using Cyrus.

The only slight difference you will see is that Cyrus will maintain the
read status for each user individually so you will need to get people to
move emails to subdirectories when they have dealt with them.

On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 14:58, Julian Field wrote:
> A better IMAP server, such as cyrus-imapd, can do this for you with no 
> problems. I use it here and have several shared IMAP mailboxes with no 
> problems at all.
> 
> Even Exchange could do this for you :)
> 
> What are you trying to use at the moment?
> 
> Steve Campbell wrote:
> > Not the place to ask, I'm sure, but maybe someone can point me to the 
> > proper place or page.
> >
> > I've googled a while, and only became more confused, as what I'd like 
> > to do is not techically a shared Imap account. What I've seen so far 
> > is that an email account is set up with different users being able to 
> > access this account. The "shared" part comes from a mailbox permission 
> > of 1777 and/or group rights.
> >
> > The policy here, for as long as I can remember, is to have one IMAP 
> > account and everyone access it with the same username and password. 
> > This causes corruption, as you might guess.
> >
> > Is it truly just file permissions or group access to a mailbox, or 
> > where should I turn to see the other magic that makes this work? I use 
> > a standard Centos 3 install.
> >
> > Thanks, and sorry for the bother of OT.
> >
> > Steve Campbell
> >
> 
> Jules
> 
> -- 
> Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
> www.MailScanner.info
> Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store
> 
> Need help customising MailScanner?
> Contact me!
> Need help fixing or optimising your systems?
> Contact me!
> Need help getting you started solving new requirements from your boss?
> Contact me!
> 
> PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.



More information about the MailScanner mailing list