Mqueue.in just keeps growing...
Martin.Hepworth
martinh at solidstatelogic.com
Thu Oct 9 09:08:48 IST 2008
Max
Anything obvious in these messages? ( unknown recipients, joe-job bounces)???
Is this the same amount of messages you were processing before?
Have you tried turnin all the RBL's off in SA and just leaving a couple of known working ones on. (nb spamhaus will put you on their 'greylist' is you query them too much as part of their usage policy), http://www.spamhaus.org/organization/dnsblusage.html. So unless you've got a pay for feed I suggest you remove them from your setup given your message load.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
> [mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf
> Of Max Kipness
> Sent: 09 October 2008 07:59
> To: MailScanner discussion
> Subject: Re: Mqueue.in just keeps growing...
>
> >How's your caching dns performance? Have you updated spamassassin?
>
> >What additional rules or plugins are you running? --
>
>
>
> Well I followed a lot of the suggestions for increasing
> performance, and although MailScanner is working a little
> better, it still cannot keep up. DNS performance is quick. I
> do not have the latest spamassassin version, but based on the
> fact that most spam is being caught by Sendmail now (as
> described below), I wouldn't think that is the problem.
>
>
>
> I added the greeting delay to sendmail, am now checking
> Spamcop and XBL at Sendmail level, and although tons of spam
> is now being caught before getting to MailScanner, my
> mqueue.in is at 30k, incoming is at a constant 180 and now
> mqueue is hovering around 2k. Mail is coming through but way
> too slow. Also, cpu is just pegged at 100% with several
> MailScanner processes, Sendmail processes, and kblockd/0 and
> kblockd/1 splitting up all cpu. I'm starting to wonder if
> after the reboot something has degraded my disk performance
> and now there isn't enough cpu for MailScanner to handle the
> number of messages coming in?
>
>
>
> I may have to resort to setting up MailScanner on another
> system at this point.
>
>
>
> Thanks for all the suggestions, and if anyone has any other
> ideas, please let me know.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Max
>
>
**********************************************************************
Confidentiality : This e-mail and any attachments are intended for the
addressee only and may be confidential. If they come to you in error
you must take no action based on them, nor must you copy or show them
to anyone. Please advise the sender by replying to this e-mail
immediately and then delete the original from your computer.
Opinion : Any opinions expressed in this e-mail are entirely those of
the author and unless specifically stated to the contrary, are not
necessarily those of the author's employer.
Security Warning : Internet e-mail is not necessarily a secure
communications medium and can be subject to data corruption. We advise
that you consider this fact when e-mailing us.
Viruses : We have taken steps to ensure that this e-mail and any
attachments are free from known viruses but in keeping with good
computing practice, you should ensure that they are virus free.
Red Lion 49 Ltd T/A Solid State Logic
Registered as a limited company in England and Wales
(Company No:5362730)
Registered Office: 25 Spring Hill Road, Begbroke, Oxford OX5 1RU,
United Kingdom
**********************************************************************
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list