Centos 5.2, MS, perl ClamAV module

[Steve Freegard]

David Lee wrote:
> 
> Is the recommendation is that we no longer use the perl ClamAV module 
> and instead use "clamd"?
> 

Yes - IMHO.  The module hogs memory as each child has it's own copy of 
the signatures; clamd is threaded and therefore all threads share a 
single in-memory copy of the signatures.

Cheers,
Steve.