users who get more than there share of spam
--[ UxBoD ]--
uxbod at splatnix.net
Tue May 27 21:59:17 IST 2008
I would look at BarricadeMX Jules if they replied to me! I appreciate I have asked a few times, as the licensing model is not correct IMHO, but I would like to integrate it with Zimbra. I know others would like to look at this aswell.
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: "curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: uxbod at sip.splatnix.net
----- "Julian Field" <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> Can you afford a copy of BarricadeMX to run on your mail server in
> addition to MailScanner?
> It will pay for itself very quickly in all the hardware that you won't
> need to replace the next time around, as the load on the system will
> drop like a stone. And you can probably throw out half your MX servers
> too, and use the boxes for some other better purpose than processing
> spam. An average site redeploys half their MX servers in other roles
> after installing BarricadeMX on the other half.
> That's my best advice for this problem, right now.
> John Baker wrote:
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
More information about the MailScanner