users who get more than there share of spam

--[ UxBoD ]-- uxbod at splatnix.net
Tue May 27 21:59:17 IST 2008


I would look at BarricadeMX Jules if they replied to me! I appreciate I have asked a few times, as the licensing model is not correct IMHO, but I would like to integrate it with Zimbra.  I know others would like to look at this aswell.

Regards,

-- 
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: "curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: uxbod at sip.splatnix.net

----- "Julian Field" <MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:

> Can you afford a copy of BarricadeMX to run on your mail server in 
> addition to MailScanner?
> 
> It will pay for itself very quickly in all the hardware that you won't
> 
> need to replace the next time around, as the load on the system will 
> drop like a stone. And you can probably throw out half your MX servers
> 
> too, and use the boxes for some other better purpose than processing 
> spam. An average site redeploys half their MX servers in other roles 
> after installing BarricadeMX on the other half.
> 
> That's my best advice for this problem, right now.
> 
> Jules.
> 
> John Baker wrote:

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the MailScanner mailing list