All mail marked as spam? - more info

[--[ UxBoD ]--]

Yes I would upgrade Clam definitely.

Regards,

-- 
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: "curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: uxbod at sip.splatnix.net

----- "Michael Chase" <Michael at kooinda.net> wrote:

> I have
> 
> MailScanner[16565]: Commercial virus checker failed with real error:
> Invalid function CL_SCAN_PHISHING_DOMAINLIST at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi/Mail/ClamAV.pm
> line 112.
> 
> in the logs.
> 
> And in MailScanner.conf
> 
> Virus Scanners = clamavmodule bitdefender
> 
> The error looks like clamav, possibly caused by some perl update that
> has come down with a yum update?
> 
> yum.log has:
> 
> Mar 05 20:33:48 Updated: perl-Test-Simple.noarch 0.78-1.el4.rf
> Mar 05 20:33:51 Updated: syslinux.i386 3.62-1.el4.rf
> Mar 05 20:33:52 Updated: perl-HTML-Tagset.noarch 3.20-1.el4.rf
> Mar 05 20:33:53 Updated: rsync.i386 3.0.0-1.el4.rf
> Mar 14 18:52:17 Updated: tzdata.noarch 2007k-2.el4
> 
> So should I update clamav or something?
> 
> I have:
> 
> # clamscan --version
> ClamAV 0.88/6074/Sun Mar  2 08:29:36 2008
> 
> 
> Michael.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.