Include tools with MailScanner distro
ugob at lubik.ca
Thu Mar 6 17:54:26 GMT 2008
Richard Siddall wrote:
> Ugo Bellavance wrote:
>> Well, it would be good, but having a package, or, even better, a
>> repository, would be better. The best would have tools distributed
>> with MailScanner, but this involves more (Julian doesn't want to
>> receive e-mails about a script that someone else wrote, extra work for
>> julian, etc).
> In one project I work on, parts of the wiki are generated from the
> source code. Presumably you could go the other way around too. However,
> this is all extra work for somebody.
It that is not too much work, the somebody could be me.
> By "repository", are you talking about something like yum/apt, or CVS/SVN?
If we generate a RPM, it may be easy to put it in a yum/apt repository.
We could use CVS/SVN for source code, but I'm less familiar with that.
More information about the MailScanner