Include tools with MailScanner distro

[Ugo Bellavance]

Richard Siddall wrote:
> Ugo Bellavance wrote:
>> Well, it would be good, but having a package, or, even better, a 
>> repository, would be better.  The best would have tools distributed 
>> with MailScanner, but this involves more (Julian doesn't want to 
>> receive e-mails about a script that someone else wrote, extra work for 
>> julian, etc).
>>
> 
> In one project I work on, parts of the wiki are generated from the 
> source code.  Presumably you could go the other way around too. However, 
> this is all extra work for somebody.

It that is not too much work, the somebody could be me.

> By "repository", are you talking about something like yum/apt, or CVS/SVN?

If we generate a RPM, it may be easy to put it in a yum/apt repository. 
    We could use CVS/SVN for source code, but I'm less familiar with that.

UGo