use_bayes not working

[Hugo van der Kooij]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Marc Lucke wrote:
| Yes, that's checked.  This was a working system.  Anywhere I can get it
| to give me debugging info?

You allready gave it:

[10721] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O /root/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
[10721] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O /root/.spamassassin/bayes_seen
[10721] dbg: bayes: found bayes db version 3
[10721] dbg: bayes: DB journal sync: last sync: 1213214587

[10721] dbg: bayes: DB journal sync: last sync: 1213214587
[10721] dbg: bayes: corpus size: nspam = 63340, nham = 154630
[10721] dbg: bayes: score = 0.215791458401563
[10721] dbg: bayes: DB expiry: tokens in DB: 120875, Expiry max size:
150000, Oldest atime: 1212853477, Newest atime: 1214166417, Last expire:
1213193735, Current time: 1214192307
[10721] dbg: bayes: DB journal sync: last sync: 1213214587

This seems to indicate your bayesian database is there and contains both
HAM and SPAM entries. (Check the atime info on:
http://esqsoft.com/javascript_examples/date-to-epoch.htm)

But what did you change to make it a non-working system? That is where
you should be looking for trouble.

For now I would backup the bayesian database and start a fresh set just
to see if that resolves the issue.

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIYhCBBvzDRVjxmYERAjpUAJ9xpFgkxtcSLYIsl9Uj0vdcgkwJJwCgqr/m
3zlXqLFQQ2pJ2440w7QYB74=
=PT/R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----