Spamassassin is slow - any tips or good commercial alternative?

[Hugo van der Kooij]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Martin.Hepworth wrote:
| Charlie
|
| Reject non-valid email recipients on the incoming MTA.
|
| If you're growing at that rate I suggest you get a couple of machines
to round robin DNS load share the mailscanner job, then if one goes pop
the other will be to carry on.

Well. If you have that many paying customers and do not have a redundant
setup I would advise your customers to walk away right now.

I run a SMTP/IMAP/POP server just for a (extended) family and I allready
started to think about redundancy.

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIXBsPBvzDRVjxmYERAmUfAKCx9w9qDMgZpMLF/gWGgG+BnAtjcgCePb81
kmSfsC8/3gSau6eZLuysxzk=
=dXpZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----