Re Help with spamassassin+mailscanner
vinayan KP
mailwatch.kp at gmail.com
Fri Jun 20 06:38:00 IST 2008
Sir,
When I built the server, I had only SUSE 10.2 and SUSE 10.3 was just
out I think. Our old server had a motherboard failure and could not
find a replacement quickly. So had to buy a new server and get the
server ready in a day. I wish you will be kind enough to help me fix
my problem.
As I told you for SA score > Required SpamAssassin Score (= 3) it works.
see the 3 sample headers below:
Where
X-yoursite-MailScanner ---> is the old mailscanner before mail server (M1)
X-econdse-MailScanner ---> is the new postfix server (M2)
==========================================================
X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-yoursite-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=35.003,
required 3, autolearn=spam, BAYES_99 3.50, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 4.06,
FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14, INVALID_MSGID 2.19, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 2.05,
RCVD_IN_XBL 3.90, URIBL_AB_SURBL 3.81, URIBL_JP_SURBL 4.09,
URIBL_OB_SURBL 3.01, URIBL_SBL 1.64, URIBL_SC_SURBL 4.50,
URIBL_WS_SURBL 2.14)
X-yoursite-MailScanner-SpamScore: sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: rosendowithoutholden at greenbuilder.com
Subject: {Spam?} Most Popular Watches of All Trademarks
X-Spam-Status: Yes, Yes
X-econdse-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-econdse-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-econdse-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
score=11.515, required 3, BAYES_99 3.50, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 4.06,
FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14, INVALID_MSGID 2.19, URIBL_SBL 1.64)
X-econdse-MailScanner-SpamScore: sssssssssss
=============================================================
X-yoursite-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=20.545,
required 3, autolearn=spam, BAD_ENC_HEADER 3.10, BAYES_99 3.50,
FROM_EXCESS_QP 0.00, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 4.00,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 2.05, SUBJECT_EXCESS_QP 0.00, URIBL_AB_SURBL 3.81,
URIBL_JP_SURBL 4.09)
X-yoursite-MailScanner-SpamScore: ssssssssssssssssssss
X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: tracy-hlahjaks at tombushmazda.dealerspace.com
X-Spam-Status: Yes, Yes
X-econdse-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-econdse-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-econdse-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=6.146,
required 3, BAD_ENC_HEADER 3.10, BAYES_60 1.00, FROM_EXCESS_QP 0.00,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 2.05, SUBJECT_EXCESS_QP 0.00)
X-econdse-MailScanner-SpamScore: ssssss
=================================================================
X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-yoursite-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=21.744,
required 3, BAYES_99 3.50, SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_P 0.70,
URIBL_AB_SURBL 3.81, URIBL_JP_SURBL 4.09, URIBL_OB_SURBL 3.01,
URIBL_SC_SURBL 4.50, URIBL_WS_SURBL 2.14)
X-yoursite-MailScanner-SpamScore: sssssssssssssssssssss
X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: leonore_fideliaeb at focusers.com
X-Spam-Status: Yes, Yes
X-econdse-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-econdse-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-econdse-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
score=20.244, required 3, BAYES_80 2.00, SUBJECT_DRUG_GAP_P 0.70,
URIBL_AB_SURBL 3.81, URIBL_JP_SURBL 4.09, URIBL_OB_SURBL 3.01,
URIBL_SC_SURBL 4.50, URIBL_WS_SURBL 2.14)
X-econdse-MailScanner-SpamScore: ssssssssssssssssssss
=================================================================
Here the mailscanner on new server gets almost equal score in 3rd
heardr, less in 2nd header and very less score in 3rd header and check
lesser lists. Why this happens?
Find below 2 headers for mails which the old mailscanner finds as spam
and the new mailscanner finds as clean.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-yoursite-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=10.601,
required 3, BAYES_50 0.00, HTML_10_20 1.35, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00,
PLING_QUERY 0.51, URIBL_JP_SURBL 4.09, URIBL_OB_SURBL 3.01,
URIBL_SBL 1.64)
X-yoursite-MailScanner-SpamScore: ssssssssss
X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: surjeet1978 at gmail.com
X-Spam-Status: Yes, No
X-econdse-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-econdse-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-econdse-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
score=0.678, required 3, BAYES_05 -1.11, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00,
INFO_TLD 1.27, PLING_QUERY 0.51)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-yoursite-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=27.176,
required 3, autolearn=spam, BAYES_99 3.50,
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET 4.00, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 2.05,
RCVD_IN_XBL 3.90, URIBL_JP_SURBL 4.09, URIBL_OB_SURBL 3.01,
URIBL_SC_SURBL 4.50, URIBL_WS_SURBL 2.14)
X-yoursite-MailScanner-SpamScore: sssssssssssssssssssssssssss
X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: c_rosamaria_iz at honeywell.com
X-Spam-Status: Yes, No
X-econdse-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-econdse-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-econdse-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
score=1.298, required 3, BAYES_00 -2.60, RCVD_IN_XBL 3.90)
X-econdse-MailScanner-SpamScore: s
X-econdse-MailScanner-From: c_rosamaria_iz at honeywell.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What should I do so that new mailscanner also gets a high score for
the above two mails and get tagged as {Spam?}
Regards
Vinu
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:01 AM, Scott Silva <ssilva at sgvwater.com> wrote:
> on 6-18-2008 12:27 AM vinayan KP spake the following:
>>
>> Sir,
>>
>> I am trying to fix the problem of mailscanner+spamassassin installed
>> on my new postfix server not detecting mails with low SA score as
>> spam. But I can see my old mailscanner which receives mails and
>> forwards it to new postfix server detects them as spam and tags them
>> {Spam?}. I am saying a sorry in advance that I won't be able to try
>> your suggestions the same day and respond with results. I will be
>> able to do whatever you suggest when I get enough time.
>>
>> I have been suggested by Mr.Scott to install pyzor, set the bayes file
>> path, permission for the beyes files, then do sa-learn etc and I have
>> done all of them. Still my new mailscanner+spamassassin dont detect
>> low scoring spams which my older mailscanner+spamassassing sytem
>> detects. Please see the mails below this, which contains the outputs
>> of:
>>
>> spamassassin -D --ling
>> spamassasin --dump magic
>> .
>>
>> Now I am getting
>> [15396] dbg: rules: local tests only, ignoring RBL eval
>> When I run a
>> # spamassassin -D --lint or
>> # spamassassin -D --ling < ..messages
>>
>> I use the following
>>
>> postfix.2.3.2-28
>> Spamassassin.3.1.6-15
>> MailScanner 4.58.9 on SUSE 10.2
>>
>>
> Looks like very old versions of spamassassin and mailscanner. Why build a
> new server with old software?
>
>
> --
> MailScanner is like deodorant...
> You hope everybody uses it, and
> you notice quickly if they don't!!!!
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
>
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list