Watermark and User Notification

[Julian Field]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

It puts in 0.0.0.0 if there was no IP address present at all.
Maybe I should change that to 127.0.0.1?
What does anyone think of that change?

Currently, you need to change your "From" line to
From: 0.0.0.0 no
FromOrTo: default yes


Donnie D. Quindardo wrote:
> Message 3EDEA100004C.D62FF from 0.0.0.0 has no (or invalid) watermark 
> or sender address
>
> Hmmm. :-)
>
> Donnie D. Quindardo wrote:
>> Unfortunately, this is not working.
>>
>> /etc/MailScanner/MailScanner.conf:
>>
>>     Scan Messages = %rules-dir%/scan.rules
>>
>> /etc/MailScanner/rules/scan.rules:
>>
>>     From:           127.0.0.1/32            no
>>     FromOrTo:       default                 yes
>>
>> The notification message sent by "Notify Senders" if their 
>> attachments are blocked is still being flagged as spam.
>>
>> Please advise,
>>
>> Don Q.
>>
>>
>> Julian Field wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Scott Silva wrote:
>>>> on 6-12-2008 1:26 PM Julian Field spake the following:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Scott Silva wrote:
>>>>>> on 6-12-2008 1:10 PM Julian Field spake the following:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Donnie D. Quindardo wrote:
>>>>>>>> - Configure MailScanner to notify users that their attachments 
>>>>>>>> have been  blocked.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Configure MailScanner to use Watermarks and note that 
>>>>>>>> messages that have no sender and no watermark are spam.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Send an e-mail through MailScanner with an attachment that is 
>>>>>>>> banned, perhaps "test.com".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - Look in the spam quarantine of MailScanner, the notification 
>>>>>>>> e-mail that is sent to the user is there. That's because it is 
>>>>>>>> sent with an envelope address of <> and does not get a 
>>>>>>>> MailScanner Signature beforehand.
>>>>>>> In which case you just need to use a ruleset to exempt mail from 
>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1 from watermarking checks. Should I do this 
>>>>>>> automatically in the code, or are there situations in which this 
>>>>>>> isn't the desired behaviour?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jules
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does a ruleset on scan messages also cover this, or is 
>>>>>> watermarking outside that catch-all?
>>>>> You don't need to do anything that radical, you just need a 
>>>>> ruleset on the option that controls the checking of watermarks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jules
>>>>>
>>>> Let me re-phrase this... If you already have a rule in scan 
>>>> messages for mailwatch releases, will it also cover the watermark 
>>>> code?
>>> If the rule is on "Scan Messages" then yes, it will cover everything.
>>>
>>> Jules
>>>
>>

Jules

- -- 
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

Need help customising MailScanner?
Contact me!
Need help fixing or optimising your systems?
Contact me!
Need help getting you started solving new requirements from your boss?
Contact me!

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.8.3 (Build 4028)
Comment: Use Enigmail to decrypt or check this message is legitimate
Charset: ISO-8859-1

wj8DBQFIUiiCEfZZRxQVtlQRAkmvAJ9mb0ZYqqzrotjXQdbAxjm+j2+wfQCginPu
0NGxjdrsTHySaDvXDtw/6Kk=
=3bx5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.