Whitelists Dont Appear to be Working

[Johnny Stork]

This is how they are listed in the Mailwatch interface? Are the 
whitlelist entries in a file? I assumed they were in the db somewhere 
since I add/manage them from mailwatch?

Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Johnny Stork wrote:
> | I am running MS 4.69.8 on Centos 5x. I  seem to be having trouble with
> | my whitelists? I seem to recall trying to address this some months back
> | and I beleive someone mentioned that my whitelists added in the
> | mailwatch interface (Lists), should not have the "@" symbol so I went
> | through and removed them all one at a time and so now they look like 
> the
> | examples below. Is this correct? Is there something else I might be
> | doing wrong?
> |
> | ifossf.org               default
> | srs.perfora.net      default
> | sungardhe.com   default
>
> This does not look like the samples I have seen untill now. Where is the
> first column in your rules file?
>
> Most rules look like:
>
> # This next line gives an example of how you might enable this option for
> # a frequent customer of yours.
> #From:          yourcustomer.com        yes
>
> # Under no circumstances should this be changed to "yes".
> FromOrTo:       default                 no
>
>
> Hugo.
>
> - --
> hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
> PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
>
>     A: Yes.
>     >Q: Are you sure?
>     >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>     >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
>
> Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFIQuQmBvzDRVjxmYERAioIAJ4/cjYms+67c14F7SWq9NzXBAjqDQCfZKD8
> TBBZ6f/N4eH9yHcfjZ7dbEs=
> =+6iz
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----