About spam attack

[Steven Andrews]

You would also need to have your outbound mail pass through the
mailscanner box for milter-null, correct?

-----Original Message-----
From: mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info
[mailto:mailscanner-bounces at lists.mailscanner.info] On Behalf Of Eduardo
Casarero
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 10:11 AM
To: MailScanner discussion
Subject: Re: About spam attack

2008/7/8 Craig Retief <craig at csfs.co.za>:
>
> On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 09:14 +0100, Martin.Hepworth wrote:
>
> Correct
>
> I suggest you pass you're outgoing via the mailscanner then the
watermarking
> will mark.
>
> I agree with Martin.
>
> I think this will be the best and easiest way to stop the back scatter
> emails.

Or you could use milter-null if youre using sendmail. Use less
resources.

>
> Cheers
>
> Craig
>
> You can put a rule against the spam scanning etc to not scan email
from the
> mailserver, but at least you'll get the watermarks in there.
>
>
>
>
> --
> MailScanner mailing list
> mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
> http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner
>
> Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting
>
> Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!
>
>
-- 
MailScanner mailing list
mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info
http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner

Before posting, read http://wiki.mailscanner.info/posting

Support MailScanner development - buy the book off the website!