Brilliant
Peter Farrow
peter at farrows.org
Sat Jan 12 10:47:07 GMT 2008
Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Peter Farrow wrote:
> | This was sent to me today, and It made me smile...
>
> Besides the issue of wether the message belongs to the list. This is
> another example of a new message being posted as a reply an in doing so
> messing up the threads. As one can see from these header lines.
>
> To: MailScanner discussion <mailscanner at lists.mailscanner.info>
> References: <787dcac20801110943u2183184aibd86bb8aad74e69a at mail.gmail.com>
> <fm8h1e$rvl$3 at ger.gmane.org>
> In-Reply-To: <fm8h1e$rvl$3 at ger.gmane.org>
> Subject: Brilliant
>
> Which will lead us to the conclusion that there definitly is not an A in
> store for Peter. I guess Jules will hand him his F.
>
> Hugo.
>
> - --
> hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
> PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc
>
> A: Yes.
> >Q: Are you sure?
> >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> >>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
>
> Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFHiIALBvzDRVjxmYERAuyeAJ4psNNSqm4KN7EDgud27cFWPK6J3QCfVROg
> 8YyDIK0UBZEiCjGJqaqhkJw=
> =ms30
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>Which will lead us to the conclusion that there definitly is not an A in
Ok I got an F....and I have to only give you 6/10 for poor
spelling..."definitly"
:-P
More information about the MailScanner
mailing list