[Maybe OT] - RFC compliance checking at session

[Hugo van der Kooij]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hostmaster wrote:

| So what do you guys think? Am I just being particularly awkward on a
| Friday afternoon and should I spend my time re-working our config to
| work around an organisation who is blatantly ignorant of common mail
| server practise, or just tell my user that the sending organisation
| needs to get their act together?

If they are aware the setup is not working well I would not spend
another milisecond on it. It's not your problem.

Hugo.

- --
hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org               http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/
PGP/GPG? Use: http://hugo.vanderkooij.org/0x58F19981.asc

	A: Yes.
	>Q: Are you sure?
	>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
	>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?

Bored? Click on http://spamornot.org/ and rate those images.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHyIT2BvzDRVjxmYERAr1+AJ9pa6qLlzXUNAl02xMxybMKnnL38ACgsW4n
IXUhg1odAWdP6+JTtD8xxy4=
=Y6//
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----