When will MailScanner + postfix actually say "421 too much load"

Julian Field MailScanner at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Thu Feb 21 14:20:25 GMT 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Ronny T. Lampert wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> topic says it all: when will a MailScanner + postfix actually go into 
> the "Too much load" situation?
>
> Will MailScanner actually affect postfix's decision to go 421?
MailScanner is not involved with the SMTP transaction at all, so this is 
nothing to do with MailScanner, it's all down to Postfix.

Jules

- -- 
Julian Field MEng CITP CEng
www.MailScanner.info
Buy the MailScanner book at www.MailScanner.info/store

Need help customising MailScanner?
Contact me!
Need help fixing or optimising your systems?
Contact me!
Need help getting you started solving new requirements from your boss?
Contact me!

PGP footprint: EE81 D763 3DB0 0BFD E1DC 7222 11F6 5947 1415 B654


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.8.0 (Build 2158)
Comment: (pgp-secured)
Charset: ISO-8859-1

wj8DBQFHvYiqEfZZRxQVtlQRAiGgAJ90157FcKKfHE5hI99jasUIDKb1VgCg9UFd
Cm+fhATDr6M56HSde8P3Gf0=
=HQF2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.



More information about the MailScanner mailing list